87. Yes, I Suck: Self-Help Through Negative Thinking
By John Cloud TIME Wednesday, Jul. 08, 2009
87-1-415
In the past 50 years, people with mental problems have spent untold millions of hours in therapists' offices, and millions more reading self-help books, trying to turn negative thoughts like "I never do anything right" into positive ones like "I can succeed." For many people including well-educated, highly trained therapists, for whom "cognitive restructuring" is a central goal the very definition of psychotherapy is the process of changing self-defeating attitudes into constructive ones.
But was Norman Vincent Peale right? Is there power in positive thinking? A study just published in the journal Psychological Science says trying to get people to think more positively can actually have the opposite effect: it can simply highlight how unhappy they are.
The study's authors, Joanne Wood and John Lee of the University of Waterloo and Elaine Perunovic of the University of New Brunswick, begin with a common-sense proposition: when people hear something they don't believe, they are not only often skeptical but adhere even more strongly to their original position. A great deal of psychological research has shown this, but you need look no further than any late-night bar debate you've had with friends: when someone asserts that Sarah Palin is brilliant, or that the Yankees are the best team in baseball, or that Michael Jackson was not a freak, others not only argue the opposing position, but do so with more conviction than they actually hold. We are an argumentative species.
A. ¾îÈÖ
untold ¸·´ëÇÑ, ¸»ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº, ¹àÇôÁöÁö ¾ÊÀº. therapist ÀÓ»óÀÇ»ç, Ä¡·á»ç.
cognitive restructuring ìãò±(ÀÎÁö)°³Á¶ÀÛ¾÷. definitionïÒëù(Á¤ÀÇ).
psychotherapy Á¤½Å ¿ä¹ý. Norman Vincent Peale ¡°Àû±ØÀû »ç°í¹æ½ÄÀÇ Èû¡±(The Power of Positive Thinking)ÀÇ îÊíº(ÀúÀÚ). the opposite effect ¹Ý´ëÈ¿°ú.
highlight ...À» µÎµå·¯Áö°Ô ÇÏ´Ù, °Á¶ÇÏ´Ù. author îÊíº(ÀúÀÚ).
proposition Ù¤ð¹(¸íÁ¦). skeptical üãë÷îÜ(ȸÀÇÀû)ÀÎ, ÀÇ½É ¸¹Àº.
adhere ¹ÐÂøÇÏ´Ù, ͳáú(°í¼ö)ÇÏ´Ù. debate ÅäÀÇ, Åä·Ð. assert ÁÖÀåÇÏ´Ù.
Sarah Palin 2008³â ¹Ì±¹´ëÅë·É¼±°Å ºÎÅë·ÉÈĺ¸. freak º¯Á¾, ±«¹°.
conviction ½Å³ä, È®½Å. argumentative ³íÀïÀûÀÎ, Åä·ÐÇϱ⸦ ÁÁ¾ÆÇÏ´Â.
species ðú(Á¾).
B. ±¸¹®
- you need look no further . . . you've had with friends:
[´ÊÀº ¹ã ¼úÁý¿¡¼ Ä£±¸µé°ú ¹ú¸° Åä·Ðº¸´Ù ´õ ¸Ö¸® »ý°¢ÇÒ Çʿ䵵 ¾ø´Ù]
87-2-416
And so we constantly argue with ourselves. Many of us are reluctant to revise our self-judgment, especially for the better. In 1994, the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology published a paper showing that when people get feedback that they believe is overly positive, they actually feel worse, not better. If you try to tell your dim friend that he has the potential of an Einstein, he won't think he's any smarter he will probably just disbelieve your contradictory theory, hew more closely to his own self-assessment and, in the end, feel even dumber. In one fascinating 1990s experiment demonstrating this effect called cognitive dissonance in official terms a team including psychologist Joel Cooper of Princeton asked participants to write hard-hearted essays opposing funding for the disabled. When these participants were later told they were compassionate, they felt even worse about what they had written.
For the new paper, Wood, Lee and Perunovic measured 68 students on their self-esteem. The students were then asked to write down their thoughts and feelings for four minutes. Every 15 seconds during those four minutes, one randomly assigned group of the students heard a bell. When they heard it, they were supposed to tell themselves, "I am a lovable person."
A. ¾îÈÖ
constantly ºÒº¯ÇϰÔ, Ç×»ó. argue Åä·ÐÇÏ´Ù, ³íÀïÇÏ´Ù.
reluctant ½È¾îÇÏ´Â, ³»Å°Áö ¾Ê´Â. revise áóïá(¼öÁ¤)ÇÏ´Ù. self-judgment ÀÚüÆÇ´Ü.
journal Á¤±â°£Ç๰, ÀâÁö, Àϱâ, ½Å¹®. personality Àμº, °³¼º, Àι°.
feedback Çǵå¹é, áêü½(¼Ûȯ). overly °úµµÇϰÔ, Áö³ªÄ¡°Ô. positive ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ.
dim ÀÌÇØ·ÂÀÌ µÐÇÑ. potential °¡´É¼º, ÀáÀç·Â. smart ¶È¶ÈÇÏ´Ù.
contradictory theory ¸ð¼øÀûÀÎ ÀÌ·Ð. hew...to °íÁýÇÏ´Ù, µû¸£´Ù.
self-assessment ÀÚüÆò°¡. feel even dumber ÈξÀ ´õ µÐÇÏ´Ù°í ´À³¢´Ù.
fascinating ¸ÅȤÀûÀÎ, ȲȦÄÉ ÇÏ´Â. demonstrate Áõ¸íÇÏ´Ù, ÒÕñû(³íÁõ)ÇÏ´Ù, ¼³¸íÇÏ´Ù.
cognitive ÀνÄÀÇ, ò±ÊÆ(Áö°¢)ÀÇ. dissonance ºÎÁ¶È. official terms °ø½ÄÀûÀÎ ¿ë¾î.
participants ½ÇÇèÂü¿©ÀÚµé, ½ÇÇè´ë»óÀÚµé. hard-hearted Þªï×(ºñÁ¤)ÇÑ, ¸ôÀÎÁ¤ÇÑ.
funding for the disabled Àå¾ÖÀε鿡°Ô ÀÚ±ÝÀ» Áö¿øÇÏ´Â °Í.
compassionate ÀÎÁ¤ ±íÀº, µ¿Á¤ÀûÀÎ, ÃøÀºÈ÷ ¿©±â´Â. measure ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ´Ù.
self-esteem ÀÚÁ¸, ÀںνÉ. randomly ÙííÂêÓ(¹«ÀÛÀ§)·Î. assign ¹èÁ¤ÇÏ´Ù, ÇÒ´çÇÏ´Ù.
randomly assigned group ÙííÂêÓàÔïÒÏØ(¹«ÀÛÀ§¼±Á¤±º).
B. ±¸¹®
- when people get feedback . . . they actually feel worse, not better.
[»ç¶÷µéÀº Àڽſ¡ ´ëÇØ¼ Áö³ªÄ¡°Ô ±àÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù°í ¹Ï°ÔµÇ´Â Çǵå¹éÀ» °¡Áö°Ô µÇ¸é ±×µéÀº ½ÇÁ¦·Î Àڽſ¡ ´ëÇØ¼ ´õ ³ª»Ú°Ô(ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î) »ý°¢ÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù.]
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












