140-2-658
Some parts of America have long taken a tough, frontier attitude to justice. That tendency sharpened around four decades ago as rising crime became an emotive political issue and voters took to backing politicians who promised to stamp on it. This created a ratchet effect: lawmakers who wish to sound tough must propose laws tougher than the ones that the last chap who wanted to sound tough proposed. When the crime rate falls, tough sentences are hailed as the cause, even when demography or other factors may matter more when the rate rises tough sentences are demanded to solve the problem. As a result, America¡¯s incarceration rate has quadrupled since 1970.
Similar things have happened elsewhere. The incarceration rate in Britain has more than doubled, and that in Japan increased by half, over the period. But the trend has been sharper in America than in most of the rich world, and the disparity has grown. It is explained neither by a difference in criminality (the English are slightly more criminal than Americans, though less murderous), nor by the success of the policy: America¡¯s violent-crime rate is higher than it was 40 years ago.
Conservatives and liberals will always feud about the right level of punishment. Most Americans think that dangerous criminals, which statistically usually means young men, should go to prison for long periods of time, especially for violent offences. Even by that standard, the extreme toughness of American laws, especially the ever broader classes of ¡°criminals¡± affected by them, seems increasingly counterproductive.
A. ¾îÈÖ
frontier attitude º¯°æÀûÀÎ ÀÚ¼¼(¼ºÎ°³Ã´½Ã´ëÀÇ ¹«¹ýÀÚ¸¦ ´Ù·ç´ø ŵµ).
take to ÁÁ¾ÆÇÏ´Ù. stamp on Áþ¹â´Ù. ratchet Åé´Ï¹ÙÄûÀÇ ¿ªÈ¸ÀüÀ» ¹æÁöÇÏ´Â ÀåÄ¡.
ratchet effect ¼öÁØÀÌ ³·¾ÆÁ®µµ ±×¸¸Å ³·¾ÆÁöÁö ¾Ê°Ô ÇÏ´Â ÀúÁöÀÛ¿ë.
chap ³ð, ³à¼®, ´Ü°ñ. sentences à¾Í±(¼±°í). hail ȯȣÇÏ´Ù, ¿ì¹Ú.
demography Àα¸(ÇÐ). incarceration ÷áè«(Åõ¿Á).
quadruple 4¹è·Î Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Ù. disparity ºÒ±ÕÇü. criminality ¹üÁËÇàÀ§.
Conservatives º¸¼öÁÖÀÇÀÚ. liberals Áøº¸ÁÖÀÇÀÚ, ÀÚÀ¯ÁÖÀÇÀÚ.
feud ´ÙÅõ´Ù, ÚãÙÍ(¹Ý¸ñ)ÇÏ´Ù. statistically Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î.
offence ¹üÁË, °ø°Ý. classes Ý»×¾(ºÎ·ù). criminals ¹üÁËÀÚ.
broader classes of ¡°criminals¡± affected by them ±×·± ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ´Â ³ÐÀº ¹üÀ§ÀÇ ¹üÁËÀÚµé.
counterproductive Þªßæß§îÜ(ºñ»ý»êÀû)ÀÎ.
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












