(Government) workers of the world unite! ¨é

158-3-713
Public-sector unions are some of the world¡¯s most powerful interest groups. Many of them have large memberships and comparably large wallets: the American National Education Association, the main teachers¡¯ union, has 3.2m members, an annual budget of over $300m and a vibrant tradition of political activism. But their influence goes much deeper. In many countries unions prop up the left. In Britain Ed Miliband, the leader of the Labour Party, owes his job to trade-union votes. In America Andy Stern, the head of the Service Employees International Union, was the most frequent guest at the White House in the first six months of Barack Obama¡¯s presidency.
Public-sector unions enjoy advantages that their private-sector rivals only dream of. As providers of vital monopoly services, they can close down entire cities. And as powerful political machines, they can help to pick the people who sit on the other side of the bargaining table. Daniel DiSalvo, the author of an excellent essay on America¡¯s public-sector unions in National Affairs, points out that the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees was the biggest contributor to political campaigns in 1989-2004. He also notes that such influence is more decisive in local campaigns, where turnout is low, than in national ones.

A. ¾îÈÖ
interest groups ÀÌÀÍÁý´Ü. wallets Áö°©. annual budget ¿¬°£¿¹»ê.
vibrant ÈûÂù, Áøµ¿ÇÏ´Â. prop up ¶°¹ÞÄ¡´Ù. Employees Çǰí¿ëÀÚ.
vital »ý±â ³ÑÄ¡´Â, Àý´ë·Î ÇÊ¿äÇÑ. monopoly µ¶Á¡.
services (Àü±â, ¼öµµ, Åë½Å, ±³À° µî) 3Â÷ »ê¾÷. bargaining table Çù»óÅ×À̺í.
Municipal ã¼(½Ã)ÀÇ, Áö¹æÀÇ. contributor úÌÑÑìÑ(Çå±ÝÀÎ), ±âºÎÀÎ, ±â¿©ÀÚ.
local campaigns Áö¹æ¼±°Å. turnout ÅõÇ¥ÀÚ ¼ö.
  • Æ®À§ÅÍ
  • ÆäÀ̽ººÏ
  • ¡èÀ§·Î
Copyright ¨Ï Á¶°©Á¦´åÄÄ - ¹«´ÜÀüÀç ¹× Àç¹èÆ÷ ±ÝÁö
´ñ±Û´Þ±â ´ñ±Û¾²±â ÁÖÀÇ»çÇ×

´ñ±Û´Þ±â´Â ·Î±×ÀÎÈÄ »ç¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ³»¿ëÀº 100ÀÚ À̳»·Î Àû¾îÁֽʽÿÀ. ±¤°í, ¿å¼³, ºñ¼Ó¾î, ÀνŰø°Ý°ú ÇØ´ç ±Û°ú °ü·Ã ¾ø´Â ±ÛÀº »çÀüÅ뺸¾øÀÌ »èÁ¦µË´Ï´Ù.

PC ¹öÀü