158-4-714
Even if they fail to elect ¡°their¡± candidates, public-sector unions have a relatively easy time negotiating with politicians. Private-sector bosses are accustomed to playing hardball with unions because they know they can go bankrupt if they don¡¯t. Politicians have no such discipline: they can always raise taxes or borrow from future generations. Those who have challenged the unions have often regretted it. California¡¯s former governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, tried to fight the unions in the court of public opinion, only to be outgunned. Others have attempted a more stopgap approach, only to get the blame when services are disrupted.
Economists still debate exactly what impact public-sector unions have on pay. Evidence from the American Bureau of Labour Statistics support the conservative argument that they have used their power to extract a wage premium: public-sector workers earn, on average, a third more than their private-sector counterparts. Left-leaning economists reply that public-sector workers are, on average, better educated. Whatever the merits of this argument, three things seem clear. Unions have suppressed wage differentials in the public sector. They have extracted excellent benefits for their members. And they have protected underperforming workers from being sacked.
Wage differentials are relatively small in the public sector. Lower-level workers, such as secretaries, are usually better paid than their private-sector equivalents, whereas higher-level workers are worse paid. This not only makes it difficult to attract high-flyers into the public sector, but also makes it hard to raise standards by, for instance, putting the best head teachers in charge of groups of schools.
A. ¾îÈÖ
candidates ý¦ÜÍ(Èĺ¸). public-sector unions ÍëÍì(°ø°ø)ºÐ¾ß ³ëÁ¶.
relatively »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î. are accustomed to ...¿¡ Àͼ÷ÇÑ.
play hardball ¾öÇÑ Á¶Ä¡¸¦ ÃëÇÏ´Ù, Àû±ØÀûÀΠŵµ¸¦ ÃëÇÏ´Ù.
go bankrupt ÆÄ»êÇÏ´Ù. discipline ÈÆ·Ã, ýºÌü(ÈÆ°è). governor ÁÖÁö»ç.
outgun ûýÕô(È·Â)ÀÌ ¿ì¼¼ÇÏ´Ù. stopgap Ú¯Üîóþ(¹ÌºÀÃ¥), ±¸¸Û ¸Þ¿ì±â.
disrupt ºÎ¼ö´Ù, ±³Åë, Åë½Å, ¼öµµ µîÀ» ÀϽà ºÒÅëÄÉ ÇÏ´Ù. ÁߴܽÃŰ´Ù.
Bureau of Labour Statistics ³ëµ¿Åë°è±¹. conservative º¸¼öÀûÀÎ.
extract »Ì¾Æ³»´Ù, ÃßÃâÇÏ´Ù. counterparts ÜùÜâ(ºÎº»), ÞÐÜâ(»çº»), »ó´ë¹æ.
Left-leaning economists ñ§ÌË(Á°æ) °æÁ¦Àü¹®°¡. suppress ¾ï¾ÐÇÏ´Ù, ±ÝÁöÇÏ´Ù.
differentials Â÷º°, °ÝÂ÷, Ú°ÝÂ(¹ÌºÐ). underperforming ¾÷¹«¼öÇàÀÌ ÝÕòÉ(ºÎÁø)ÇÑ.
sack ÇØÀÓÇÏ´Ù. Wage differentials ÀӱݰÝÂ÷. secretaries ºñ¼.
equivalents µî°¡¹°, µ¿µîÇÑ »ç¶÷. high-flyers î¦ÞÍ(Àç»ç), Æ÷ºÎ°¡ Å« »ç¶÷, ¾ß½É°¡.
head teachers ±³Àå.
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












