170-2-774
Californians thus explicitly chose a path that diverged from the one America¡¯s founders had taken. To understand California¡¯s problems today, you need to know what tradition California departed from. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and their peers, as they met for the constitutional convention in Philadelphia in 1787, had deliberately rejected direct democracy. So why did Californians second-guess them?
Deeply versed in the classics, the founders had seen ancient Athens as the main historical example of direct democracy. In that city every male adult citizen voted in the assembly and there were no distinct executive or judicial branches. But this was also the Athens that condemned Socrates to death, rashly launched a disastrous pre-emptive war against Syracuse and barely survived repeated oligarchic coups before succumbing to undemocratic Macedonia.
Greek thinkers such as Aristotle and Polybius concluded that democracy was inherently unstable because it led to mob rule (in the same way that monarchy deteriorated into tyranny and aristocracy into oligarchy). Those three elements, monarchy, aristocracy and democracy, thus had to be balanced for a state to remain free, they argued. Rome (before the emperors) became the prime example of such a mixture. It was a republic, a ¡°public thing¡±, but not a democracy, a thing ¡°ruled by the people¡±. It had executives (in the shape of two annually elected consuls), an elite in the senate, and outlets for the vox populi in the popular assemblies.
A. ¾îÈÖ
explicitly ¸í¹éÇϰÔ. diverge °¥¶óÁö´Ù, ÝÂÐ÷(ºÐ±â)ÇÏ´Ù, ¹þ¾î³ª´Ù.
peers µ¿·á, ±ÍÁ·. constitutional convention Çå¹ýȸÀÇ.
deliberately °íÀÇÀûÀ¸·Î, ½ÅÁßÇϰÔ, ÞÖÕç(»ç·Á)±í°Ô. reject °ÅºÎÇÏ´Ù.
second-guess î¢ÍÅ(Àç°í)ÇÏ´Ù. versed ðãçá(Á¶¿¹)°¡ ±íÀº, ïñ÷×(Á¤Åë)ÇÑ.
classics ͯîð(°íÀü). assembly Áýȸ, ÀÔ¹ýÀÇȸ.
distinct º°°³ÀÇ, È®½ÇÇÑ, µ¶Æ¯ÇÑ.
executive or judicial branches ÇàÁ¤ºÎ³ª »ç¹ýºÎ.
condemn ¼±°íÇÏ´Ù, À¯ÁË·Î ÆÇ°áÇÏ´Ù, ºñ³ÇÏ´Ù. rashly °æ¼ÖÇϰÔ, Á¶±ÞÇϰÔ.
pre-emptive à»ð¤(¼±Á¦)ÀÇ, ¼±¸Å±ÇÀÇ. barely °Ü¿ì, °¡±î½º·Î, °ÅÀÇ...¾Ê´Â.
survive À§±â¸¦ À̱â°í »ì¾Æ³²´Ù, ...À» ¸éÇÏ´Ù, º¸´Ù ¿À·¡ »ì´Ù.
oligarchic ÍûÔéïÙö½(°úµÎÁ¤Ä¡)ÀÇ, ¼Ò¼öµ¶ÀçÁ¤Ä¡ÀÇ.
succumb ±¼º¹ÇÏ´Ù. inherently Ÿ°í³ª°Ô, ¼±ÃµÀûÀ¸·Î.
mob Æøµµ. monarchy ±ºÁÖÁ¦. deteriorate Ÿ¶ôÇÏ´Ù. tyranny øìïÙ(ÆøÁ¤).
aristocracy ±ÍÁ·Á¤Ä¡. oligarchy °úµÎÁ¤Ä¡. executives ÇàÁ¤°ü.
consuls ÁýÁ¤°ü, ¿µ»ç. outlets ¹æÃⱸ, ´ë¸®Á¡. vox populi ¹é¼ºÀÇ ¼Ò¸®.
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












