170-8-780
Direct democracy in California is thus an aberration. It has no safeguards against Madison¡¯s tyranny of the majority. It recognises no saucer that might cool the passions of the people. Above all, it is not a system intended to contain minority factions. Instead, it encourages special interests to wage war by ballot measure until one lobby prevails and imposes its will on all. Madison and Hamilton would have been horrified.
But in 1911 none of this was yet clear. The system had the potential to be coercive, but its actual effect would depend on context and usage. Indeed, the number of ballot measures, once the novelty wore off, declined and stayed low as the Southern Pacific¡¯s power faded naturally. For decades, immigrants populated the state, and most problems seemed to take care of themselves. But all this changed abruptly in 1978, with an unprecedented initiative that shapes the state to this day: Proposition 13.
A. ¾îÈÖ
aberration Å»¼±, ïáÔ³(Á¤µµ) ìÆ÷(ÀÌÅ»). factions µµ´ç, ´çÆÄ.
interests ÀÌÀÍÁý´Ü. wage ÀüÀïÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ´Ù.
measure ¼ö´Ü, Á¶Ä¡. prevails À̱â´Ù, ¾ÐµµÇÏ´Ù.
impose °¿äÇÏ´Ù. would have been horrified °øÆ÷¿¡ »ç·ÎÀâÇûÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
potential ÀáÀç·Â. coercive °¾ÐÀûÀÎ, êÎäâ(À§¾Ð)ÀûÀÎ.
context ØæÕ©(¸Æ¶ô), »óȲ, ÀüÈİü°è. novelty »ö´Ù¸¥ °Í, ½Å±âÇÔ.
wore off ÁÙ¾îµé´Ù, Á¡Â÷·Î »ç¶óÁö´Ù. fade ½Ãµé´Ù.
immigrants À̹Î. abruptly °©ÀÚ±â. unprecedented à»ÖÇ(¼±·Ê)°¡ ¾ø´Â.
Proposition ±¹¹ÎÁ¦¾È.
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












