172-1-785
IN 1971 A CONFERENCE of state legislatures concluded that California¡¯s ¡°comes the closest to having all the characteristics that a legislature should have¡±. A lot of people agreed. In the mid-1970s a political scientist, William Muir, was so impressed by the collegiality, expertise and diligence he witnessed in Sacramento¡¯s capitol that he called his book ¡°Legislature: California¡¯s School for Politics¡±. It was, he said, ¡°the finest in the world¡±.
Alas, Mr Muir was working on an academic time scale and his book, though researched before Proposition 13, was not published until the 1980s. By then the initiative storms were buffeting the legislature. And thus another perfectly good book title became the victim of terrible timing as a model political institution turned into a caricature of itself.
Today Californians reserve a special disdain for their legislature. When Arnold Schwarzenegger called legislators ¡°girlie men¡±, Californians for once agreed with him. In a poll last December by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), a non-partisan think-tank in San Francisco, 81% of voters disapproved of their legislature and only 12% approved: blood relatives and paid staffers, as the joke goes.
California¡¯s legislature must therefore have undergone a stunning decline in the past three decades. What role the initiative process had in this deterioration is a chicken-and-egg question. In Hiram Johnson¡¯s day initiatives seemed to be needed as a check on a venal legislature. Now perhaps a dysfunctional legislature is triggering a plethora of initiatives as citizens take matters into their own hands.
A. ¾îÈÖ
legislature ÀÔ¹ýºÎ. wither ½Ãµé´Ù. redistribute ÀçºÐ¹èÇÏ´Ù.
state legislatures ñ¶(ÁÖ) ÀÔ¹ý±â°ü. characteristics Ư¡.
collegiality ÇÕµ¿, ´ÜüÀû ¼º°Ý. expertise Àü¹®¼º, Àü¹®±â¼ú.
Sacramento Ä®¸®Æ÷´Ï¾ÆÀÇ ñ¶Ô´(ÁÖµµ). capitol ±¹È¸ÀÇ»ç´ç ¶Ç´Â ñ¶ÀÇȸ ÀÇ»ç´ç.
Proposition ±¹¹ÎÁ¦¾È. initiative ±¹¹Î¹ßÀÇ. buffet Ÿ°ÝÇÏ´Ù.
institution Á¦µµ, ±â°ü, ÇÐȸ. caricature ýôûþûù(ÈñÈÈ), dzÀÚ¸¸È.
a model political institution turned into a caricature of itself. ¸ð¹üÀûÀÎ Á¤Ä¡Á¦µµ°¡ ½º½º·Î ÇϳªÀÇ ÈñÈÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î µÈ °Í. cf. turned ´Â Çü¿ë»ç.
reserve ¿¹¾àÇÏ´Ù, ¾î¶² ¸ñÀûÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ºñÃàÇÏ´Ù. disdain °æ¸ê.
girlie ¼Ò³à, ¸ÅÃáºÎ. for once À̹ø¸¸Àº. poll ¿©·ÐÁ¶»ç, ÅõÇ¥.
Public Policy Institute °ø°øÁ¤Ã¥¿¬±¸¼Ò.
non-partisan think-tank õ±ÓÚ÷ï(ÃÊ´çÆÄ)Àû ¿¬±¸¼Ò.
blood relatives úìæÞ(Ç÷¿¬)°ü°èÀÚ. must have undergone °æÇèÇÏ¿´À½¿¡ Ʋ¸²¾ø´Ù.
stun ±âÀýÇÏ´Ù. deterioration äÂûù(¾ÇÈ), ÀúÇÏ, Ÿ¶ô.
venal µ·À¸·Î Á¿ìµÇ´Â, Ÿ¶ôÇÑ. legislature ÀÔ¹ý±â°ü, ñ¶ ÀÇȸ.
dysfunctional ±â´ÉÀå¾ÖÀÇ. trigger õºÛ¡(Ã˹ß)½ÃŰ´Ù.
plethora Φí¥(°úÀ×), ΦÒý(°ú´Ù).
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












