The withering branch ¨í

172-7-791
This once again contributes to partisan rigidity. ¡°Knowing they won¡¯t be around for a long time, there¡¯s no incentive to compromise,¡± says Gary Moncrief, an expert on legislatures at Boise State University in Idaho. With so little time, every vote counts as legislators try to repay their debts to the donors who put them in the job and prepare their next career move. They need not worry about a politically convenient vote that has long-term costs because those will be the problem of a different set of legislators.
In 2002 Idaho¡¯s legislature became the first to repeal that state¡¯s term-limits initiative. Legislatures or courts in five other states have since followed. But California does not allow initiatives to be amended, so they remain until the issue comes to the ballot box again (which may be next year).
The net effect of all initiatives is that the legislative branch of California¡¯s government has been split in two. The initiative process, originally meant as a safety valve, has in reality become a rival to the legislature. Two law-making bodies—the voters and their representatives—are in open competition. The tragedy is that this undermines democracy by eliminating one of its main purposes: accountability. Schools have suffered the most.

A. ¾îÈÖ
rigidity ÌãòÁ(°æÁ÷). partisan rigidity ´çÀÇ ³ë¼±¿¡ ÁýÂøÇÏ´Â °Í.
contributes Á¦°øÇÏ´Ù, ±â¿©ÇÏ´Ù. compromise ŸÇù.
counts Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù. repeal °ÅÀýÇÏ´Ù, ÅðÂ¥ ³õ´Ù. amend ¼öÁ¤ÇÏ´Ù.
split Âɰ³Áö´Ù. undermines ÈѼÕÇÏ´Ù. eliminate Á¦°ÅÇÏ´Ù.
accountability Ã¥ÀÓ.

  • Æ®À§ÅÍ
  • ÆäÀ̽ººÏ
  • ¡èÀ§·Î
Copyright ¨Ï Á¶°©Á¦´åÄÄ - ¹«´ÜÀüÀç ¹× Àç¹èÆ÷ ±ÝÁö
´ñ±Û´Þ±â ´ñ±Û¾²±â ÁÖÀÇ»çÇ×

´ñ±Û´Þ±â´Â ·Î±×ÀÎÈÄ »ç¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ³»¿ëÀº 100ÀÚ À̳»·Î Àû¾îÁֽʽÿÀ. ±¤°í, ¿å¼³, ºñ¼Ó¾î, ÀνŰø°Ý°ú ÇØ´ç ±Û°ú °ü·Ã ¾ø´Â ±ÛÀº »çÀüÅ뺸¾øÀÌ »èÁ¦µË´Ï´Ù.

PC ¹öÀü