177-2-812
Some prison inmates are incorrigibly violent and must be kept apart from society, but most are not. They are there to be punished, hence the maxim, ¡°We build prisons for people we¡¯re afraid of and fill them with people we¡¯re mad at.¡± Flogging, Mr Moskos argues, would at least let society punish people swiftly and efficiently. Brutal and archaic it may be, but Mr Moskos convincingly argues that America¡¯s prison system is at least as inhumane. ¡°If we really wanted to punish people,¡± Mr Moskos writes, ¡°we could sentence drug offenders to join gangs and fear for their lives we could punish child abusers to torture followed by death we could force straight men to have semiconsensual prison-gay sex¡¦All these things already happen, but we just sweep them under the rug and look the other way.¡±
The system is also broken: entities that profit from incarceration—prison-guard unions and private-prison builders—lobby for longer sentences, while politicians build prisons in poor rural areas. ¡°The cynical among us,¡± Mr Moskos writes, ¡°might even say we¡¯re spending billions of dollars to pay poor rural unemployed whites to guard poor urban unemployed blacks.¡± And indeed prisons tend to be filled with poor minorities: more than half of all black men without a high-school diploma spend time in jail. Though in recent years a few states have started to roll back against the trend of ever longer, ever harsher sentencing, these efforts amount to little more than bailing out a sinking supertanker with a teacup.
Mr Moskos¡¯s proposal begins as a provocation and ends bleakly plausible. But flogging is still flogging. There may exist little political will to legalise drugs or rethink how and why criminals are punished, but America is not about to start whipping people again anytime soon. Perhaps the most damning evidence of the broken American prison system is that it makes a proposal to reinstate flogging appear almost reasonable. Almost.
A. ¾îÈÖ
inmates î¤Êøíº(Àç°¨ÀÚ), ÇǼö¿ëÀÚ. incorrigibly Îìïá(±³Á¤) ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÒ Á¤µµ·Î.
maxim Ì«åë(°Ý¾ð), ±Ý¾ð, Íë×â(°ø¸®). mad ȳ.
Flogging ¸ÅÁú, ÷Âúý(ÅÂÇü). efficiently È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î. Brutal ÀÜÀÎÇÑ.
archaic ³°Àº, ͯù¦(°ídz)ÀÇ. convincingly ¼³µæ·Â ÀÖ°Ô, ³³µæÀÌ µÇµµ·Ï.
offenders ¹ü¹ýÀÚ. abusers ÇдëÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷, ³²¿ëÀÚ. torture ͸Ùý(°í¹®), °íÅë.
straight ¸¶¾àÀ» ¸Â°í ÈïºÐÇÑ. semiconsensual ¹ÝÂë ÇÕÀÇÇÑ.
sweep them under the rug ¼öÄ¡½º·¯¿î ÀÏÀ» ¼û±â´Ù.
entities ½ÇÀç, ½ÇÀçÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷À̳ª »ç¹°. incarceration Åõ¿Á, ϬÐ×(±¸±Ý).
The cynical ³Ã¼ÒÁÖÀÇÀÚµé. diploma Á¹¾÷Áõ¸í¼. roll back ¿ªÀü½ÃŰ´Ù, °ÝÅðÇÏ´Ù.
amount to ÃѰè...¿¡ ´ÞÇÏ´Ù. bailing out À§±â¿¡¼ ±¸ÇÏ´Ù.
sinking ħ¸ôÇÏ´Â. supertanker õ±ÓÞúþ(ÃÊ´ëÇü) êúðËàÏ(À¯Á¶¼±).
provocation ÓûÛ¡(µµ¹ß), µµÀü. bleakly ¾µ¾µÇϰÔ, Ç®ÀÌ Á×Àº.
plausible ±×·²µíÇÑ. legalise ÇÕ¹ýÈÇÏ´Ù. whipping äÂïÁúÇÏ´Ù.
damning À¯Á˸¦ Áõ¸íÇÏ´Â, ÀúÁÖÀÇ. damning evidence È®½ÇÇÑ Áõ°Å.
reinstate º¹±Ç(º¹À§)½ÃŰ´Ù.
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












