181-3-827
Discriminating against people on the grounds of personal appearance should be banned, she says. It limits a person¡¯s right to equal opportunity, reinforces the subordination of groups where unappealing characteristics, including obesity, are concentrated (ie, the poor, some ethnic minorities), and restricts self-expression. Yet because ugliness is harder to define than race or sex, some argue that anti-discrimination laws are impossible to maintain. And anyway, say employers, appearance is often relevant to the job at hand.
Ms Rhode sees the hurdles, but argues that they can be dealt with. In places where ¡°lookism¡± is already prohibited (eg, Washington, DC), such statutes have not provoked a flood of frivolous cases, she says. Occasionally beauty is essential to a business (ie, modelling, but not air-hostessing). But concerns about an employee¡¯s effectiveness often reflect the biases of employers, not customers. Laws influence attitudes over time, she says, by denying those with prejudices the opportunity to indulge them.
¡°Honey Money¡±, Catherine Hakim¡¯s provocative book, is a different kettle of fish. Where Mr Hamermesh and Ms Rhode see discrimination, she sees an opportunity for women to enhance their power ¡°in the bedroom and the boardroom¡±. She argues that ¡°erotic capital¡± is an underrated class of personal asset, to set beside economic capital (what you have), human capital (what you know) and social capital (who you know). Ms Hakim attempts to quantify a complex mix of physical and social assets, consisting of beauty, sex appeal, self-presentation, social skills, liveliness and sexual competence. Like other sorts of capital, the erotic kind is important for success but unlike others it is largely independent of birth and class. It is especially valuable for poor people, young people, the newly arrived and the otherwise unqualified. In heterosexual settings it belongs primarily to women.
A. ¾îÈÖ
Discriminate Â÷º°ÇÏ´Ù. on the grounds of...¸¦ ±Ù°Å·Î.
ban ±ÝÁöÇÏ´Ù. reinforces °È½ÃŰ´Ù. subordination çæáÕ(¿¹¼Ó), ÌîãÊ(°æ½Ã).
unappealing ¸Å·ÂÀÌ ¾ø´Â, È£¼Ò·ÂÀÌ ¾ø´Â. characteristics Ư¡.
obesity ÝþØ»(ºñ¸¸). Á¾ÆÄ. ethnic ÀÎÁ¾. restricts Á¦ÇÑÇÏ´Ù.
relevant °ü·ÃµÇ´Ù. hurdles Àå¾Ö¹°, °ï¶õ. prohibit ±ÝÁöÇÏ´Ù.
statutes ¹ý·É. frivolous °æ¼ÖÇÑ, ÇÏÂúÀº. cases ÞÀÖÇ(»ç·Ê), ¼Ò¼Û»ç°Ç, ¹®Á¦.
Occasionally °¡²û. air-hostessing ½ºÆ©¾îµð½º ÀÏÀ» ÇÏ´Ù.
employee Çǰí¿ëÀÚ. bias Æí°ß. over time ½Ã°£ÀÌ °¨¿¡ µû¶ó.
prejudices Æí°ß. indulge Á¦¸Ú´ë·Î ÇÏ°Ô µÎ´Ù, ¸¶À½²¯ ´©¸®´Ù.
provocative µµ¹ßÀûÀÎ. a different kettle of fish º°°³ »çÇ×, ܬÙýð¹(º°¹®Á¦).
enhance Çâ»óÇÏ´Ù. boardroom Áß¿ª ȸÀǽÇ. underrated °ú¼ÒÆò°¡µÈ.
class Ý»×¾(ºÎ·ù). asset íÀß§(ÀÚ»ê). set beside ¿Í ºñ±³ÇÏ´Ù.
quantify ͪÕá(°è·®)ÇÏ´Ù. self-presentation ÀÚ±âÇ¥Çö.
independent of ...·ÎºÎÅÍ µ¶¸³µÈ. the newly arrived »õ·Î µé¾î¿Â »ç¶÷.
heterosexual ì¶àõ(À̼º)ÀÇ.
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












