184-2-836
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, ¡°I like to see fist fights¡±, ¡°The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear¡±, and ¡°When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning¡±. Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had ¡°strongly agree¡± at one end and ¡°strongly disagree¡± at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person¡¯s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas (push the fat guy off the bridge) and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone¡¯s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
A. ¾îÈÖ
previous ì¤îñ(ÀÌÀü)ÀÇ. nature ¼º°Ý, ¼ºÁú. undergraduates ´ëÇÐ ÀçÇлý.
a battery of ìéÖ§(ÀÏ·Ã)ÀÇ. scale ô©Óø(ôµµ). Participants Âü°¡ÀÚµé.
statements Áø¼ú. fist ÁÖ¸Ô. handle ´Ù·ç´Ù. indicate °¡¸®Å°´Ù.
on a continuum ¿¬¼Ó¼±»ó¿¡. respectively °¢°¢. psychopathy Á¤½Åº´.
correlate ßÓμ(»ó°ü)½ÃŰ´Ù. personality tests ìÑàõËþÞÛ(Àμº°Ë»ç).
Craft ¸¸µé´Ù. legislation ¹ý·É, ¹ý·üÁ¦Á¤. inevitably ºÒ°¡ÇÇÇϰÔ.
roughshod ÆíÀÚ¿¡ ½ºÆÄÀÌÅ©¸¦ ´Ü.
riding roughshod over °ÅÄ¥°Ô ´Ù·ç´Ù, ³²¿¡°Ô Æó¸¦ ³¢Ä¡´Ù.
plausible ĪÂùÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ, ±×·²µíÇÑ. framework ±¸Á¶, »À´ë.
trample Áþ¹â´Ù. obtain üòÔð(ȹµæ)ÇÏ´Ù. Psychopathic Á¤½Åº´ÀÚ.
misanthrope Àΰ£À» ½È¾îÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷, ¿°¼¼ÁÖÀÇÀÚ, Àΰ£Çø¿À.
Apparently ºÐ¸íÈ÷.
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












