185-3-839
Envy and common sense
If class is America¡¯s ¡°forbidden thought¡±, and not even the left has been strongly driven by economic egalitarianism, is it a tactical error for Mr Obama to keep calling on millionaires and billionaires, hedge-fund managers, the owners of corporate jets and other assorted fat cats to pay higher taxes in hard times? It is certainly misleading of him to imply that America will be able to tame its deficit and protect entitlements by raising taxes on the rich alone: the maths suggests that the middle class will have to pay too. But that does not make it bad politics. America is not so exceptional that its people are impervious to the sin of envy, or to commonsensical notions about what is fair. A Gallup poll published on September 20th found that those who supported raising the taxes of the rich outnumbered opponents by 66% to 32%.
Besides, American politics is not as free of class as politicians think. It is often said that Americans do not choose between parties for mainly economic reasons. This is a myth. Larry Bartels, a political scientist who defines class by income rather than education, concluded in his 2008 book, ¡°Unequal Democracy¡±, that ¡°traditional class politics is alive and well¡± in America. His data show that the Republicans are in general the party of the rich and Democrats the party of the poor. Bill Clinton steered clear of class politics, especially in his second term when he moved sharply to the centre. But in 2000 Al Gore injected a strongly populist tone into his campaign. ¡°They¡¯re for the powerful, we¡¯re for the people,¡± he said in accepting the Democratic presidential nomination. And, pace Mr Kazin, the left has just scored a gigantic victory in the form of the health-insurance subsidies that the poor will receive from Mr Obama¡¯s Affordable Care Act.
A. ¾îÈÖ
Envy ºÎ·¯¿ò, ÁúÅõ, àÌØÐ(¼±¸Á). egalitarianism ÆòµîÁÖÀÇ.
tactical Àü¼úÀûÀÎ. calling on ¿ä±¸ÇÏ´Ù. corporate jets ȸ»ç Á¦Æ®ºñÇà±â.
assorted ºÐ·ùµÈ. hedge-fund ÅõÀÚ½ÅŹ Á¶ÇÕ.
fat cats ¼¼·Â°¡, µ· ¸¹Àº ±Ç·Á°¡, Á¤Ä¡ÀÚ±Ý ¸¹ÀÌ ¹ÙÄ¡´Â ºÎÀÚ.
imply ¾Ï½ÃÇÏ´Ù. tame ±æµéÀÌ´Ù. deficit ÀûÀÚ, °á¼Õ.
entitlements (¿¬±Ý, ÀÇ·á, »ýȰº¸È£ÀÚ ±Þ¿© µî) áôû³(¼öÇý) ÀÚ°Ý.
exceptional ¿¹¿ÜÀûÀÎ. impervious ¹«°¨°¢ÇÑ, µÐ°¨ÇÑ, ºÒħÅõ¼ºÀÇ.
notions ËÈÒ·(°³³ä). opponents ¹Ý´ëÀÚ. political scientist Á¤Ä¡ÇÐÀÚ.
traditional ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ. Republicans °øÈ´ç¿ø(ÀÇ¿ø).
Democrats ¹ÎÁÖ´ç¿ø. steer Á¶Á¾ÇÏ´Ù. steered clear of ...À» ÇÇÇÏ´Ù, °ü°èÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Ù.
term ÀÓ±â. inject ñ¼ìý(ÁÖÀÔ)ÇÏ´Ù. campaign ¼±°Å¿îµ¿, ÀüÀï. nomination Áö¸í, ÀÓ¸í.
pace¡²peisi¡³prep. ¿¡°Ô´Â ½Ç·ÊÁö¸¸. pace Mr Kazin Ä«Áø¾¾¿¡°Ô´Â ½Ç·ÊÁö¸¸.
gigantic °Å´ëÇÑ. subsidies º¸Á¶±Ý. Affordable ÁÙ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â, ÀÔ¼ö °¡´ÉÇÑ.
Affordable Care Act ÀÇ·á ¼öÇý°¡´É ¹ý.
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Áö¹æ¼±°ÅÀÇ ÀǹÌ
- 2 5¿ù31ÀÏÀº ±èÀϼº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ÆíÁö ¾´ ³¯
- 3 À°»ç(ëÁÞÍ)°¡ ¹Ì¿ì¸é À°»ç¸¸ ÆóÁöÇ϶ó
- 4 ¿Ö ¸»¸®´Â »ç¶÷±îÁö ÈæÈ(ýÙûù)Çϴ°¡?
- 5 ÃÖ¾ÇÀÇ ÀúÁúµé¿¡°Ô Áö¹è´çÇÏ´Â ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Çö½Ç
- 6 ³ëÀε鿡°Ô ȸÀü¿îµ¿À» ºÎÃß±â´Ù´Ï
- 7 çïá¦ý³(¿À¼¼ÈÆ) ¼¿ï½ÃÀåÀÇ ½Â¸®´Â ¿øÄ¢°ú Á¤ÀÇÀÇ ½Â¸®´Ù
- 8 ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀº ÀÌÀç¸í Á¤±ÇÀ» ½ÉÆÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù
- 9 ³²ÇÑ ºÎÀΰúÀÇ ÀÌÈ¥ µ¿±â(ÔÑѦ) - '±×³É ½È¾î¼'
- 10 ±èÁøÀº Àú½Â¿¡¼ Çѵ¿ÈÆÀ» ÀÀ¿øÇϰí ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù!












