28. What Would Orwell Say? (TIME July 7, 2003)
More than 50 years after his death, we still miss his keen eye and analysis by Michael Elliott
28-1-117
If you are a writer on contemporary events and aspire to immortality, you had better have something special in your pen. George Orwell, whose centenary was celebrated last week, had honesty and clarity of expression. Combined, they enabled a man who was almost sick to produce a body of work--essays, reviews, novels like Animal Farm and 1984--that will illumine the next generation's understanding of the world as much as it did those of the past two.
Orwell, who died in 1950, never shrank from the big stuff. 'The three great subjects of the twentieth century were imperialism, fascism and Stalinism,' writes Christopher Hitchens in his wonderful book Why Orwell Matters. Those were Orwell's topics, and he was right on all of them: able to pierce the hypocrisy of imperial adventures, to warn of the deathly appeal of fascism, and--when many were in thrall to the supposed achievements of the Soviet Union--to state badly that Stalin was a 'disgusting murderer.' It is because Orwell was unflinching in his opposition to all the totalitarianisms of the past century that he was such a bewildering range of acolytes--liberals unable to stomach the idea that one race should lord it over another, socialists for whom his willingness to fight fascism in Spain is an inspiration, conservatives who are certain that had he lived, he would have become a true cold warrior, determined to roll back communism wherever its poisoned shoots took root.
A. ¾îÈÖ
keen ¿¹¸®ÇÑ. analysis ºÐ¼®. contemporary Ó×ÓÛ(´ç´ë)ÀÇ, µ¿½Ã´ëÀÇ.
aspire ¿¸ÁÇÏ´Ù. immortality ºÒ¸ê, Üôý®(ºÒÈÄ).
had better+µ¿»ç¿øÇü(V)¡æ...ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÁÁ´Ù. centenary 100³â ±â³äÀÏ, 100³âð®(Á¦).
celebrate ...À» ±â³äÇÏ´Ù. clarity ¸íÄè, Ù¥Öü(¸í·á). illumine ¹àÇôÁÖ´Ù, °è¸ùÇÏ´Ù.
the past two=the past two generations. shrink-shrank-shrunk(shrunken) ¿òÃ÷¸®´Ù.
stuff ÁÖÁ¦, Àç·á, ¹°°Ç, Ư¼º, ÀÛǰ. subject ÁÖÁ¦. imperialism Á¦±¹ÁÖÀÇ.
matter Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù. pierce °üÅëÇÏ´Ù. hypocrisy êÊà¼(À§¼±). appeal Èû, ¸Å·Â, °£Ã», È£¼Ò.
thrall ³ë¿¹, ¼Ó¹Ú. in thrall to ...¿¡ »ç·ÎÀâÈ÷´Ù. supposed °¡Á¤µÇ´Â, »ó»óµÇ´Â.
badly Áöµ¶È÷, ³ª»Ú°Ô. disgusting ¿ª°Ü¿î, Á¤³ª¹Ì°¡ ¶³¾îÁö´Â. unflinching ±ÁÈ÷Áö ¾Ê´Â.
totalitarianism ÀüüÁÖÀÇ. bewildering ´çȲÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â.
acolyte ÞÞÚ¯ã¬(»ç¹Ì½Â), ã´ã¬(½Ã½Â), ðôíº(Á¾ÀÚ). liberal ÀÚÀ¯ÁÖÀÇÀÚ.
stomach ¼ÒÈÇÏ´Ù. race ÀÎÁ¾. lord over ¾ÈÇϹ«ÀÎÀ¸·Î »µ±â´Ù.
willingness ±â²¨ÀÌ Çϱâ, ÀÚÁøÇؼ Çϱâ. inspiration çÏÊï(¿µ°¨).
conservative º¸¼öÁÖÀÇÀÚ. warrior îúÞÍ(Àü»ç), º´»ç. roll back ¹°¸®Ä¡´Ù.
shoot »õ½Ï.
B. ±¸¹®
- combined, they enabled . . . a body of work.
cf. combined¡æbeing combined¡æ when they were combined
[Á¤Á÷¼º°ú ¸í·á¼ºÀÌ °áÇÕÇÏ¿© °ÅÀÇ È¯ÀÚ°¡ µÈ »ç¶÷À¸·Î ÇÏ¿©±Ý ìéÏØ(Àϱº)ÀÇ ÀÛǰÀ» »ý»êÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°ÔÇÏ¿´´Ù.]
- did¡æ illumined
- It is because Orwell was . . . poisoned shoots took root.
cf. °¡Á¤¹ý°ú°Å¿Ï·á µµÄ¡±¸¹®¡æhad+S+pp.
had he lived¡æIf he had lived
ex. If I had had much time, I would have enjoyed the drama.
¡æHad I had much time, I would have enjoyed the drama.
[Orwell ÀÌ-- ÇÑ ¹ÎÁ·ÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ ¹ÎÁ·À» Áö¹èÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ´ç¿¬½ÃÇÏ´Â »ç»óÀ» ¼ÒȽÃų ¼ö ¾ø´Â ÀÚÀ¯ÁÖÀÇÀÚµé, ½ºÆäÀο¡¼ ÆÄ½Ã½ºÆ®¿Í ½Î¿ì´Â µ¥ ¿µ°¨ÀÌ µÇ¾ú´ø »çȸÁÖÀÇÀÚµé, ±×°¡ »ì¾Ò´õ¶ó¸é °ø»êÁÖÀǰ¡ µ¶ÀÌ ¿À¸¥ »õ½ÏÀ» »Ñ¸®¸¦ ³»¸®´Â °÷Àº ¾îµð¿¡¼µçÁö °ø»êÁÖÀǸ¦ ÂѾƳ»±â·Î °á½ÉÇÑ ³ÃöÇÑ îúÞÍ(Àü»ç)°¡ µÇ¾úÀ» °ÍÀ̶ó°í È®½ÅÇÏ´Â º¸¼öÁÖÀÇÀÚµé°ú °°Àº --±×Åä·Ï ³î¶øµµ·Ï ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¹üÀ§¿¡ µå´Â Àι°ÀÌ µÇ¾ú´ø °ÍÀº ±×°¡ Áö³ ¼¼±â(20¼¼±â)ÀÇ ¸ðµç ÀüüÁÖÀÇÁÖÀÇ(Á¦±¹ÁÖÀÇ, ÆÄ½ÃÁò, °ø»êÁÖÀÇ µî)¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼ ÁÙ±âÂ÷°Ô ¹Ý´ëÇÏ¿´±â ¶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù.]
28-2-118
I wish he were with us now; our times cry out for someone with Orwell's gifts of clear-eyed observation and analysis. What would he have thought, I wonder, of American policy in Afghanistan and Iraq, which uses essentially imperialist means to defeat fascist regimes and rebuild nations ravaged by them? Orwell was not a pacifist. He had lived long enough among the poor in Britain and France to understand the inequities of the liberal democracies, but he had a splendid contempt for those unwilling to defend them against a greater evil. If he believed that rogue states or radical Islamic terrorists had the means and motive to threaten Western lives and liberties, he would surely have supported the use of armed force to eradicate the danger.
At the same time, Orwell might have doubted the wisdom of some current policies--the willingness to speckle the Islamic world with American garrisons or award contracts for the reconstruction of wrecked nations to favored companies. His loathing of imperialism was visceral, because he knew, first-hand, what it meant. In the 1920s Orwell had served in the imperial police in Burma, then a British colony, and the experience left him with an almost physical hatred for the behavior--in fact, the very language and look--of the imperialist class. Last week I reread Burmese Days, Orwell's 1934 novel based on his time in Asia. It is not a great book--as a novelist, Orwell had less depth than his near contemporaries, Graham Greene and Anthony Powell--but it is bleakly unsettling, as page after page of racism and cruelty leaves you feeling in need of a shower.
A. ¾îÈÖ
cry out Å©°Ô ¿ÜÄ¡´Ù. gifts Àç´É. observation °üÂû. means ¼ö´Ü.
defeat ...¿¡ ½Â¸®ÇÏ´Ù, ŸµµÇÏ´Ù. regime ïÙÏí(Á¤±Ç). ravage ȲÆóȽÃŰ´Ù, ÆÄ±«ÇÏ´Ù.
pacifist ÆòÈÁÖÀÇÀÚ. inequity ºÒ°øÆò. liberal democracies ÀÚÀ¯¹ÎÁÖÁÖÀÇ ±¹°¡µé.
splendid ´ë´ÜÇÑ, °ÉÃâÇÑ, Ź¿ùÇÑ. contempt °æ¸ê. rogue ¾Ç´ç, »ç±â²Û.
rogue state ¾Ç´çÀÇ ³ª¶ó. radical ±ÞÁøÀûÀÎ, °ú°ÝÇÑ, ±Ùº»ÀÇ, ±âÃÊÀûÀÎ.
Western lives and liberties ¼±¸ÀÚÀ¯¹ÎÁÖÁÖÀÇ ³ª¶óÀÇ »ý¸í°ú ÀÚÀ¯.
eradicate ±ÙÀýÇÏ´Ù, ÚÒØþ(¹Ú¸ê)ÇÏ´Ù. current ÇöÀçÀÇ. speckle ¾ó·è´ú·èÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Ù, ¹ÝÁ¡.
garrison ñÒÔêÏÚ(Áֵбº), °æºñ´ë. award »óǰ, »ó. award contract ƯÇý°è¾à.
wrecked nations ³ÆÄµÈ ³ª¶ó. favored companies ƯÇý¸¦ ¹Þ´Â ȸ»ç.
loathing úîç÷(Çø¿À). visceral Ò®íô(³»Àå)ÀÇ, °¨Á¤ÀûÀÎ. first-hand Á÷Á¢, ¹Ù·Î.
contemporaries µ¿½Ã´ëÀÇ ÀÛ°¡µé. bleak Ȳ·®ÇÑ, ¸Å¼·°Ô Âù, ¾µ¾µÇÑ.
racism ÀÎÁ¾Â÷º°Á¤Ã¥, ¹ÎÁ·Àû ¿ì¿ù°¨. cruelty ÀÜÀμº. shower ¼Ò³«ºñ.
B. ±¸¹®
- I wish he were with us now. (°¡Á¤¹ý °ú°Å)
=I am sorry that he is not here.
- them¡æ the liberal democracies
- he would surely have supported . . .armed force
cf. would+have+pp.¡æ...¸¦ ÇÏ¿´À» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
[±×´Â ±º»ç·ÂÀÇ È°¿ëÀ» È®½ÇÈ÷ ÁöÁöÇÏ¿´À» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.]
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 À嵿ÇõÀÇ í»øï "¿ì¸®°¡ Ȳ±³¾ÈÀÌ´Ù"
- 2 ºÎ»êÀº µé¶° ÀÖ´Ù
- 3 ³ª¶ó°¡ ¹«³ÊÁø´Ù. ¹üÁËÀÚ ´ëÅë·É ¶§¹®¿¡
- 4 ×Ý´ëÅë·ÉÀº Àß°í °Ì¸¹Àº »ç¶÷!...'Àڱ⠰úÀ׺¸È£'°¡ ºÒ·¯¿Â Áß´ëÀ§±â
- 5 'µ¿¹°±¹È¸' ´ÙÀ½ ÄÚ½º´Â 'Áü½Â±¹È¸'
- 6 ÀÌÀç¸íÀÇ ÆøÁ¤(øìïÙ) ¿À·¡ °¡Áö ¸øÇÒ °Í
- 7 '¹Îº¹ ¾¾ÀÇ °ßÇØ¿¡ µ¿ÀÇÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù'(À̵¿º¹)
- 8 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÌ ³ë¸¸¼® °ËÂûÃÑÀå´ëÇàÀ» ù¶ñÊ(ÇÊÁÖ)ÇÏ´Ù!
- 9 ´ëȰ¡ ¾È µÇ´Â °ÍÀÌ ±Ø¿ì¿Í ±ØÁÂÀÇ Æ¯Â¡
- 10 '4õ¾ïÂ¥¸® µµµÏÁú' ¼º°ø? Á¤Àǵµ ¹ÎÁÖµµ °øÈµµ Á×¾ú´Ù!












