Science &Technology
Criminology
53. Can the can
Nov 20th 2008 From The Economist print edition
The idea that graffiti-spraying and other forms of low-level delinquency promote further bad behaviour has now been tested experimentally
53-1-239
A PLACE that is covered in graffiti and festooned with rubbish makes people feel uneasy. And with good reason, according to a group of researchers in the Netherlands. Kees Keizer and his colleagues at the University of Groningen deliberately created such settings as a part of a series of experiments designed to discover if signs of vandalism, litter and low-level lawbreaking could change the way people behave. They found that they could, by a lot: doubling the number who are prepared to litter and steal.
The idea that observing disorder can have a psychological effect on people has been around for a while. In the late 1980s George Kelling, a former probation officer who now works at Rutgers University, initiated what became a vigorous campaign to remove graffiti from New York City's subway system, which was followed by a reduction in petty crime. This idea also underpinned the 'zero tolerance' which Rudy Giuliani subsequently brought to the city's streets when he became mayor.
A. ¾îÈÖ
criminology ¹üÁËÇÐ. graffiti ³«¼, ±ÜÀº ±×¸².
graffiti-spraying ½ºÇÁ·¹ÀÌ·Î ³«¼ÇÏ´Â °Í. delinquency Þªú¼(ºñÇà), ¸øµÈ Áþ.
festoon ²ÉÁÙ(²É.ÀÙ.»öÁ¾ÀÌ µûÀ§·Î ¸¸µç ÁÙ¸ð¾çÀÇ Àå½Ä), ²ÉÁÙ·Î Àå½ÄÇÏ´Ù.
rubbish ¾²·¹±â. colleague ÔÒÖö(µ¿·á). deliberately °íÀÇÀûÀ¸·Î, ½É»ç¼÷°íÇÏ¿©.
setting ȯ°æ. sign ÈçÀû, Ç¥. vandalism (¹®ÈÀÇ) ÆÄ±«, ¾ß¸¸½º·¯¿î Áþ.
litter ¾îÁú·¯Áø °Í, ¾²·¹±â. disorder ¹«Áú¼, ³Àâ, ¼Ò¶õ, òðü´(Áúȯ).
probation òûú¼ë¢çã(ÁýÇàÀ¯¿¹). initiate ½ÃÀÛÇÏ´Ù. vigorous Ȱ¹ßÇÑ. reduction °¨¼Ò.
petty ÇϱÞÀÇ, »ç¼ÒÇÑ. underpin ±âÃÊÀÇ ÀϺθ¦ ¸¸µé´Ù. tolerance °ü¿ë.
zero tolerance °ü¿ëÀ» º£Ç®Áö ¾Ê´Â °Í, ¾ö°ÝÇÏ°Ô Ã³¹úÇÏ´Â °Í.
subsequently ±× ÀÌÈÄ¿¡.
B. ±¸¹®
- Kees Keizer and his colleagues . . . the way people behave.
cf. the way people behave¡æthe way in which people behave. in which=how
[Groningen ´ëÇÐÀÇ Kees Keizer ¿Í ±×ÀÇ µ¿·áµéÀº ¾ß¸¸½º·¯¿î Áþ, ¾²·¹±â ¹ö¸®±â, »ç¼ÒÇÑ ¹ý·üÀ§¹ÝÀÇ ÈçÀûÀÌ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÇൿÀ» ¾î¶»°Ô º¯È½ÃŰ´Â °¡¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æ³»±â À§Çؼ °í¾ÈµÈ ½ÇÇèÁßÀÇ Çϳª·Î¼ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ È¯°æ(³«¼¸¦ Çϰųª ¾²·¹±â¸¦ ¹ö¸° Àå¼Ò)À» Àǵµ ÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¸µé¾ú´Ù.]
- observing disorder
[¾îÁú·¯Áø Àå¸éÀ» º¸´Â °Í]
53-2-240
Many cities and communities around the world now try to get on top of anti-social behaviour as a way of deterring crime. But the idea remains a controversial one, not least because it is often difficult to account for other factors that could influence crime reduction, such as changes in poverty levels, housing conditions and sentencing policyeven, some people have argued, the removal of lead from petrol. An experimental test of the 'broken windows theory', as Dr Kelling and his colleague James Wilson later called the idea, is therefore long overdue. And that is what Dr Keizer and his colleagues have provided.
The writing's on the wall
Dr Kelling's theory takes its name from the observation that a few broken windows in an empty building quickly lead to more smashed panes, more vandalism and eventually to break-ins. The tendency for people to behave in a particular way can be strengthened or weakened depending on what they observe others to be doing. This does not necessarily mean that people will copy bad behaviour exactly, reaching for a spray can when they see graffiti. Rather, says Dr Keizer, it can foster the 'violation' of other norms of behaviour. It was this effect that his experiments, which have just been published in Science, set out to test.
A. ¾îÈÖ
get on top of ...¿¡ ½Â¸®ÇÏ´Ù, ¾ÐµµÇÏ´Ù. deter ...À» ¹æÁöÇÏ´Ù.
controversial ³íÀïÀÇ ¿©Áö°¡ ÀÖ´Â. not least ÀûÁö ¾Ê°Ô(=much).
account for ¼³¸íÇÏ´Ù. sentencing policy åÖúýïÙóþ(¾çÇüÁ¤Ã¥). removal Á¦°Å.
lead ³³. petrol ÈÖ¹ßÀ¯.
overdue òÀæÅ(Áö¿¬)µÈ(´ç¿¬È÷ ÇØ¾ß µÉ ÀÏÀ» ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÖ´Â), ±âÇÑÀÌ Áö³.
smash ¹Ú»ì³»´Ù. pane À¯¸®Ã¢. eventually ¸¶Ä§³», °á±¹¿¡´Â. break-in ºÒ¹ýħÀÔ.
depending on ...¿¡ µû¶ó¼, ...¿¡ Á¿ìµÇ¾î.
not necessarily ¹Ýµå½Ã...ÇÏÁö´Â ¾Ê´Ù(ºÎºÐºÎÁ¤). reach for ...À» ÇâÇØ ¼ÕÀ» »¸´Ù.
spray can ½ºÇÁ·¹ÀÌ Åë. foster ð¾íþ(Á¶Àå)ÇÏ´Ù, ÃËÁøÇÏ´Ù, ¾çÀ°ÇÏ´Ù. norm ±Ô¹ü, Ç¥ÁØ.
norms of behaviour Çൿ±Ô¹ü. set out Âø¼öÇÏ´Ù.
B. ±¸¹®
- depending on . . . others to be doing.
[´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÌ ÇൿÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» º¸´Â °Í¿¡ Á¿ìµÇ¾î]
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 À嵿ÇõÀÇ í»øï "¿ì¸®°¡ Ȳ±³¾ÈÀÌ´Ù"
- 2 ºÎ»êÀº µé¶° ÀÖ´Ù
- 3 ³ª¶ó°¡ ¹«³ÊÁø´Ù. ¹üÁËÀÚ ´ëÅë·É ¶§¹®¿¡
- 4 ×Ý´ëÅë·ÉÀº Àß°í °Ì¸¹Àº »ç¶÷!...'Àڱ⠰úÀ׺¸È£'°¡ ºÒ·¯¿Â Áß´ëÀ§±â
- 5 'µ¿¹°±¹È¸' ´ÙÀ½ ÄÚ½º´Â 'Áü½Â±¹È¸'
- 6 ÀÌÀç¸íÀÇ ÆøÁ¤(øìïÙ) ¿À·¡ °¡Áö ¸øÇÒ °Í
- 7 '¹Îº¹ ¾¾ÀÇ °ßÇØ¿¡ µ¿ÀÇÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù'(À̵¿º¹)
- 8 ´ëȰ¡ ¾È µÇ´Â °ÍÀÌ ±Ø¿ì¿Í ±ØÁÂÀÇ Æ¯Â¡
- 9 Çѵ¿ÈÆÀÌ ³ë¸¸¼® °ËÂûÃÑÀå´ëÇàÀ» ù¶ñÊ(ÇÊÁÖ)ÇÏ´Ù!
- 10 '4õ¾ïÂ¥¸® µµµÏÁú' ¼º°ø? Á¤Àǵµ ¹ÎÁÖµµ °øÈµµ Á×¾ú´Ù!












