Darwinism: Why we are, as we are ¨í

A Darwinian analysis of the matter cannot say where the equilibrium would lie in a world free from discrimination.
57-13-266
In that context, it is less of a surprise that older women are out-earned by their male contemporaries. One reason is that they now care less about the size of their earnings. Of the top 25 ideal employers, as chosen by women, the IEA found that 12 were in the public or voluntary sectorsareas where salaries for equivalent work tend to be lower than in the private sector, though job security is higher and job satisfaction is often believed to be greater. For men, only four employers were in this category. The other reason, of course, is that women usually look after the children. Indeed, the study by Dr Nettle and Dr Pollet which found that reproductive success correlates with men's income, also points out that with women the correlation is inverted. But the IEA study also found that it is women themselves who are taking the decisions about child care. It reports that two-thirds of the women who had not already had a 'career break', as it is euphemistically known, planned to take one at some point in the future. Less than an eighth of men had similar aspirations. That, too, would be predicted by a Darwinist.
Although there is a strong argument for making working conditions more sympathetic to the needs of parents of both sexes, the underlying point is that many womenand certainly many women with childrendo not care as much about striving ahead in their careers as men do. Men, the report found, are more motivated by pay and less by job satisfaction than women are. If managers, they are more likely to work long hours. They also take more risksor, at least, are more frequently injured at work.

A. ¾îÈÖ
context ¸Æ¶ô, ï×üÏ(Á¤È²). less of a surprise ³î¶ö ÀÏÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï´Ù.
out-earn ¼öÀÔÀÌ ´õ ¸¹´Ù. contemporary °°Àº ³ªÀÌÀÇ »ç¶÷, µ¿½Ã´ëÀÎ, µ¿±â»ý.
voluntary ÀÚ¹ßÀûÀÎ, í»êÃ(ÀÚ¿ø)ÀÇ. sector ºÐ¾ß. equivalent work µ¿µîÇÑ ¾÷¹«(ÀÏ).
security ÜÁñû(º¸Áõ), ¾Èº¸, ¾ÈÀü. category ºÎ¹®, ÛôñÂ(¹üÁÖ). correlate »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´Ù.
invert ¹Ý´ë·Î ÇÏ´Ù, °Å²Ù·Î ÇÏ´Ù. career break ÈÞÁ÷.
euphemistically èÆÍØåÞÛö(¿Ï°î¾î¹ý)À¸·Î, ³ÍÁö½Ã µÑ·¯¼­ ¸»ÇÏ´Â. aspiration ¿­¸Á, Æ÷ºÎ. strive ahead ºÐÅõÇØ¼­ ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ³ª¾Æ°¡´Ù. motivate µ¿±â¸¦ ºÎ¿©ÇÏ´Ù.

57-14-267
The consequence, as Len Shackleton, the IEA report's main author, puts it, is that: 'The widespread belief that the gender pay gap is a reflection of deep-rooted discrimination by employers is ill-informed and an unhelpful contribution to the debate. The pay gap is falling but is also a reflection of individuals' lifestyle preferences. Government can't regulate or legislate these away, and shouldn't try to.' He failed to add, however, that these preferences are often the result of biological differences between the sexes.
What goes for pay probably goes for career choice as well. At one extreme, it is foolish, as Kingsley Browne of Wayne State University, in Michigan, suggests, to expect equal outcomes in organisations like the armed forces. Not only are men stronger and more aggressive but, Mr Browne suggests, the psychology of both sexes has evolved to trust men (and not trust women) in combat, precisely because of this aggression and strength. At the other end of the scale, it is probably an opposite mixture of evolved aptitudes and attitudes that causes the domination by females of professions such as nursing.
This is not to say there can be no good female soldiers or male nurses. Patently, there can. But it is not clear evidence of discrimination that they are rarer than their counterparts of the opposite sex. A Darwinian analysis of the matter cannot say where the equilibrium would lie in a world free from discrimination. But it can say with reasonable confidence that this equilibrium will often not be 50/50.

A. ¾îÈÖ
put it ¾ð±ÞÇÏ´Ù. gender àõ(¼º). gender pay gap ³²³àºÀ±ÞÂ÷ÀÌ. reflection ¹Ý¿µ.
contribution ±â¿©, °øÇå. preference ÁÁ¾ÆÇÔ, ¼±È£.
regulate...away Юð¤(±ÔÁ¦)ÇÏ¿©¼­ Á¦°ÅÇÏ´Ù. legislate...away ¹ý·üÀ» Á¦Á¤ÇÏ¿© Á¦°ÅÇÏ´Ù.
go for °£ÁֵǴÙ, »ý°¢µÇ´Ù. extreme ±Ø´Ü. the armed forces ÏÚ(±º).
aggressive °ø°ÝÀûÀÎ. precisely Á¤È®È÷. opposite ¹Ý´ëÂÊÀÇ. mixture È¥ÇÕ.
aptitude Àû¼º. domination ¿ì¼¼, ¿ì¿ù, Áö¹è. patently ¸í¹éÈ÷. equilibrium ÆòÇü.

B. ±¸¹®
- At the other end of the scale
[ôµµ(°ø°Ý¼º)ÀÇ ´Ù¸¥ ÂÊ ³¡(°ø°Ý¼ºÀÌ °¡Àå ³·Àº ÁöÁ¡)]
- But it is not clear evidence . . . of the opposite sex.
[ì¶àõ(À̼º)ÀÇ »ó´ë¹æº¸´Ù ±×µéÀÇ ¼ö(±ºÀÎÀ̳ª °£È£¿ø)°¡ ´õ Àû´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ ¼ºÂ÷º°ÀÇ Áõ°Å´Â ¾Æ´Ï´Ù.]
- where the equilibrium . . . free from discrimination.
[¼ºÂ÷º°ÀÌ ¾ø´Â ¼¼»ó¿¡¼­ ±× ÆòÇüÀÇ Á¡(³²³àÀÇ ¼ö°¡ ±ÕÇüÀ» ÀÌ·ç´Â Á¡)ÀÌ ¾îµð°¡ µÉ´ÂÁö´Â]
  • Æ®À§ÅÍ
  • ÆäÀ̽ººÏ
  • ¡èÀ§·Î
Copyright ¨Ï Á¶°©Á¦´åÄÄ - ¹«´ÜÀüÀç ¹× Àç¹èÆ÷ ±ÝÁö
´ñ±Û´Þ±â ´ñ±Û¾²±â ÁÖÀÇ»çÇ×

´ñ±Û´Þ±â´Â ·Î±×ÀÎÈÄ »ç¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ³»¿ëÀº 100ÀÚ À̳»·Î Àû¾îÁֽʽÿÀ. ±¤°í, ¿å¼³, ºñ¼Ó¾î, ÀνŰø°Ý°ú ÇØ´ç ±Û°ú °ü·Ã ¾ø´Â ±ÛÀº »çÀüÅ뺸¾øÀÌ »èÁ¦µË´Ï´Ù.

PC ¹öÀü