Leaders
Education in America and Britain
85. Learning lessons from private schools
Jul 2nd 2009 From The Economist print edition
The right and wrong ways to get more poor youngsters into the world's great universities
85-1-408
LOTS of rich people and crummy state schools, especially in the big cities where well-off folk tend to live: these common features of America and Britain help explain the prominence in both countries of an elite tier of private schools. Mostly old, some with fat endowments, places like Eton, Harrow and Phillips Exeter have done extraordinarily well. Fees at independent schools have doubled in real terms over the past 25 years and waiting lists have lengthened. Even in the recession, they are proving surprisingly resilient. A few parents are pulling out, but most are soldiering on and plenty more are clamouring to get their children in.
Row, row together
All sorts of class-based conspiracy theories exist to explain the success of such institutions, but the main reason why they thrive in a more meritocratic world is something much more pragmatic: their ability to get people into elite universities. For Britain and America also have the world's best universities. Look at any of the global rankings and not only do the Ivy League and Oxbridge monopolise the top of the tree, British and (especially) American colleges dominate most of the leading 100 places. This summer graduates will struggle to find jobs, so a degree from a world-famous name like Berkeley or the London School of Economics will be even more valuable than usual. The main asset of the private schools is their reputation for getting children into those good universities.
A. ¾îÈÖ
leader ½Å¹®ÀÇ Þäàã(»ç¼³). crummy ÃʶóÇÑ, ÒëõÝ(´©Ãß)ÇÑ. state school °ø¸³Çб³.
well-off folk ºÎÀ¯ÇÑ »ç¶÷µé. feature Ư¡. prominence Ź¿ùÇÔ, úéîÊ(ÇöÀú)ÇÔ.
tier ¿, ÁÙ, Ãþ, ÀÏ·Ä. an elite tier of ìéÖ§(ÀÏ·Ã)ÀÇ ¿ì¼öÇÑ.
endowment ±âº»Àç»ê, ±âºÎ, ÀÚÁú. fee ¼ö¾÷·á. in real terms ½ÇÁú°¡°ÝÀ¸·Î.
waiting lists ÀÔÇÐÁö¿øÀÚ ¸íºÎ. recession ºÒ°æ±â, °æ±âÈÄÅð.
resilient ÷¥Õôàõ(ź·Â¼º)ÀÌ ÀÖ´Â, Ý¥ê«Õô(º¹¿ø·Â)ÀÌ ÀÖ´Â.
soldier on °è¼ÓÇØ¼ º¹¹«ÇÏ´Ù. clamour Àý±ÔÇÏ´Ù, ½Ã²ô·´°Ô ¿ä±¸ÇÏ´Ù.
row ³ë¸¦ Á¥´Ù. class-based »çȸ°è±Þ¿¡ ¹ÙÅÁÀ» µÐ.
conspiracy ¾î¶² °á°ú¸¦ °¡Á®¿À°Ô ÇÑ »ç°Ç-»çÁ¤ÀÇ °áÇÕ. theory ÀÌ·Ð, Çм³.
conspiracy theories °áÇÕÀÌ·Ð. thrive-throve-thriven/thrived-thrived ¹ø¿µÇÏ´Ù.
meritocratic ½Ç·ÂÀ§ÁÖ»çȸ. pragmatic ½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ.
the Ivy League ¹Ì±¹ µ¿ºÏºÎÀÇ ¸í¹®´ëÇеé. monopolise µ¶Á¡ÇÏ´Ù.
dominate Áö¹èÇÏ´Ù, ...À» Á¿ìÇÏ´Ù. graduate Á¹¾÷»ý. degree ÇÐÀ§. asset ÀÚ»ê, ÀÌÁ¡.
reputation ¸í¼º.
85-2-409
Only 7% of British children go to private schools, but they account for more than 40% of the intake at Oxford and Cambridge. That statistic is a little unfair: private schools account for a fifth of the people taking A-levels (pretty much essential for getting in). All the same it is notable that Britain's two best-known universities educate more Etonians than boys who were poor enough to get free meals at their schools. In America figures are harder to come by, but the independent sector again does disproportionately well. The universities on both sides of the Atlantic have tried to balance things up (indeed, some rich British children are whisked out of private schools in their final years so they appear to have been state-educated). But in general the elite schools deserve their reputation for getting children onto the next rung up, if only because their pupils do so much better at the exams you need to pass to get in.
A system of elite schools and universities to which the rich have privileged access is neither fair nor efficient. Yet there are worse ways of organising education. At least Britain and America have top-class universities: European and Asian countries, which dont, are scrambling to create some of their own. And attempts to increase equality by getting rid of elitism sometimes achieve the opposite: when British governments in the 1960s and 1970s abolished elite state grammar schools, it became harder still for poor, clever children to get into elite universities.
A. ¾îÈÖ
account for Ã¥ÀÓÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù, ¿øÀÎÀÌ µÇ´Ù. intake ÀÔÇÐÀοø, ¼öÀÔ, ¸Å»ó°í.
statistic Åë°èÄ¡. unfair ºÒ°øÁ¤ÇÏ´Ù. A-levels ¿µ±¹ÀÇ ´ëÇÐÀÔÇÐÀڰݽÃÇè.
essential ÇʼöÀÇ. notable ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ¸¸ÇÑ. Etonian ÀÌÅÏ°í±³ Á¹¾÷»ý.
figure ¼ýÀÚ. come by ÀÔ¼öÇÏ´Ù. sector ºÐ¾ß.
independent sector ±³À°Ã»(±³À°ºÎ)ÀÇ °£¼·À» ¹ÞÁö ¾Ê´Â Çб³.
disproportionately ºÒ±ÕÇüÀûÀ¸·Î. both sides of the Atlantic ¹Ì±¹°ú ¿µ±¹.
balance things up ºÒ±ÕÇüÀ» ú°á¼(ÇØ¼Ò)ÇÏ´Ù. whisk out of °©Àڱ⠻ç¶óÁö´Ù.
state-educated °ø¸³Çб³¿¡¼ ±³À°¹ÞÀº. deserve ...¹ÞÀ»¸¸ÇÏ´Ù.
rung »ç´Ú´Ù¸®ÀÇ °¡·ÎÀå, ´Ü°è.
getting children onto the next rung up ´ëÇп¡ ÁøÇнÃŰ´Â °Í. pupil Çлý.
privileged access Ưº°ÇÑ ÇýÅÃ(Ư±Ç)¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼ ÀÔÇÐÇÏ´Â °Í. efficient ´É·üÀûÀÎ.
scramble ¹Ù»ß ¼µÎ¸£´Ù, ±â¾î¿À¸£´Ù. equality Æòµî. abolish Æó±âÇÏ´Ù.
still ´õ¿í´õ.
85-3-410
Nowadays few reformers talk about banning independent schools. Instead they look at fiddling with university admissions. Sadly the methods of most left-leaning educators say much more about their own outdated preoccupations than about the problem. In America tragically the focus has been on race and affirmative-action programmesa system the private schools have duly exploited by giving scholarships to poor black and Hispanic pupils. In Britain the obsession has been class, with Labour ministers telling the dons of Oxford to find more working-class talent, and setting up a government "Office for Fair Access" (widely known as OffToff) to set targets, albeit non-binding ones, for the proportion of state-school applicants at each university.
There are some areas where universities could be reined innotably America's system of favouring the children of alumni. But admissions are a symptom, not a cause. Black Americans and working-class Britons struggle because they are overwhelmingly educated in poor government-run schools. Change them and you change the system. And here the private elite schools are useful exemplars. Their success is not based on money, but on organisation. Make head teachers at state schools as accountable to parents as their peers at private schools are and give them the same freedoms, notably to sack poor teachers and pay more to good ones. Then people will not need to go to Winchester or Amherst any more.
A. ¾îÈÖ
reformer °³Çõ°¡. ban ±ÝÁöÇÏ´Ù.
independent school ±³À°Ã»(±³À°ºÎ)À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ÀÏüÀÇ °£¼·À» ¹ÞÁö ¾Ê´Â Çб³.
fiddle with ¸¸ÁöÀ۰Ÿ®´Ù, ºóµÕ°Å¸®´Ù. admission ÀÔÇÐÇã°¡.
left-leaning ñ§ÌËîÜ(Á°æÀû)ÀÎ. outdated ½Ã´ë¿¡ µÚÁø.
preoccupation Æí°ß, ¼±ÀÔ°ü, ø¶ú¾(ÆíÇâ), à»ö¢Ïí(¼±Ãë±Ç). race ÀÎÁ¾.
affirmative-action ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ Çൿ. duly Á¤´çÇϰÔ, ÀûÀýÇϰÔ. exploit ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Ù.
Hispanic ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ¶óƾ ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«°è ÁÖ¹Î. pupil Çлý.
obsession ´Þ¶óºÙ¾î¼ ¶°³ªÁö ¾Ê´Â °ü³ä(°íÁúÀûÀÎ ¹®Á¦), ØÍßÌ(¸Á»ó), °¹Ú°ü³ä.
class °è±Þ, °èÃþ. Labour ministers ¿µ±¹ ³ëµ¿´çÁ¤ºÎ Àå°üµé.
Office for Fair Access°øÁ¤ÀÔÇдã´ç ôæ(û). albeit ...¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸Çϰí.
non-binding °Á¦ÀûÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ, Àǹ«ÀûÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ. applicant Áö¿øÀÚ, ½ÅûÀÚ.
rein in °í»ß·Î Á¦ÁöÇÏ´Ù, ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ´Ù. notably µÎµå·¯Áö°Ô, ¸í¹éÇϰÔ.
alumni ÔÒóë(µ¿Ã¢). symptom ¡ÈÄ, ñøßÒ(Áõ»ó). overwhelmingly ¾ÐµµÀûÀ¸·Î.
exemplar º»º¸±â, çÓ(¿¹). head teacher Îèíþ(±³Àå). accountable Ã¥ÀÓÁö´Ù.
sack ÆÄ¸é½ÃŰ´Ù. peer µ¿°©³»±â, µ¿·á.
B. ±¸¹®
- Make head teachers at state schools . . . at private schools are .
[°ø¸³Çб³ ±³Àåµµ »ç¸³Çб³ ±³À常ŠÇÐºÎ¸ð¿¡°Ô Ã¥ÀÓÀ» Áö°Ô Ç϶ó.]
ÇÑ´«¿¡ º¸´Â
º£½ºÆ® ±â»ç
- 1 »çÇü ±¸Çü ¹ÞÀº À±¼®¿Àº ¿©ÀüÈ÷ À§ÇèÀι°ÀÌ´Ù!
- 2 ´ëÅë·ÉÀÇ ¾î·Ï(åÞÖâ)¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©
- 3 '¾Çµ¶ÇÑ ò¢ñ«'´Â 50£¥, ±èÁ¤Àº Á¤±ÇÀº 70£¥ ÂøÃë
- 4 ¹ÚÁ¤Èñ´Â ±è¿µ»ï ¡°è·Î, À±¼®¿Àº ÀÌÁؼ® ¡°è·Î ¸ÁÇß´Ù!
- 5 óÀÚ½ÄÀÌ µè´Â µ¥¼ »çÇüÀ» ¸»ÇÏ´Ù´Ï
- 6 ´É·Âµµ ¾ø°í ¼º°úµµ ¸ø³»´Â °æÁ¦ÆÀ
- 7 ¾îµÎ¿î ¹Ù´å°¡¿¡¼ È¥ÀÚ »ö¼ÒÆùÀ» ºÎ´Â ³²ÀÚ
- 8 ùÛÔÔý³, ¹Ì·Ã µÎÁö ¸»°í ÷ÓÚÇØ¼ »õ ±æ ¿¶ó
- 9 ¾ï¾ÐµÈ °ÍÀº ¹Ýµå½Ã º¹¿øµÈ´Ù
- 10 ³ª¶ó ¸ÁÄ¡´Â ¡®¹ý²Ù¶óÁö¡¯ À±¼®¿¡¤Çѵ¿ÈÆ¡¤À嵿Çõ












