What went wrong with economics ¨ç

And how the discipline should change to avoid the mistakes of the past
Leaders
Economics
90. What went wrong with economics
Jul 16th 2009 From The Economist print edition

And how the discipline should change to avoid the mistakes of the past

90-1-423

OF ALL the the economic bubbles that have been pricked, few have burst more spectacularly than the reputation of economics itself. A few years ago, the dismal science was being acclaimed as a way of explaining ever more forms of human behaviour, from drug-dealing to sumo-wrestling. Wall Street ransacked the best universities for game theorists and options modellers. And on the public stage, economists were seen as far more trustworthy than politicians. John McCain joked that Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the Federal Reserve, was so indispensable that if he died, the president should "prop him up and put a pair of dark glasses on him."
In the wake of the biggest economic calamity in 80 years that reputation has taken a beating. In the public mind an arrogant profession has been humbled. Though economists are still at the centre of the policy debatethink of Ben Bernanke or Larry Summers in America or Mervyn King in Britaintheir pronouncements are viewed with more scepticism than before. The profession itself is suffering from guilt and rancour. In a recent lecture, Paul Krugman, winner of the Nobel prize in economics in 2008, argued that much of the past 30 years of macroeconomics was "spectacularly useless at best, and positively harmful at worst." Barry Eichengreen, a prominent American economic historian, says the crisis has "cast into doubt much of what we thought we knew about economics."

A. ¾îÈÖ
leader ½Å¹®»ç¼³. the discipline º»¹®¿¡¼­´Â °æÁ¦ÇÐÀ» ÀǹÌ.
discipline Çаú, Çй®ÀÇ ºÎ¹®(ºÐ¾ß). prick Âñ·¯¼­ ÀÛÀº ±¸¸ÛÀ» ¶Õ´Ù.
burst-burst-burst Æø¹ßÇÏ´Ù, ÆÄ¿­ÇÏ´Ù. spectacularly Àå¾öÇϰÔ, ±²ÀåÇϰÔ.
reputation ¸í¼º. economics °æÁ¦ÇÐ. dismal ëäߤ(À½»ê)ÇÑ, ¿ì¿ïÇÑ.
acclaim Êâóú(°¥Ã¤)¸¦ º¸³»´Ù, ȯȣÇÏ´Ù. drug-dealing ¸¶¾à°Å·¡.
ransack »ô»ôÀÌ µÚÁö´Ù. Wall Street ¹Ì±¹ ±ÝÀ¶½ÃÀåÀÇ Áß½ÉÁö. theorist À̷а¡.
option ¼±Åà ¸Å¸Å±Ç. modeller ¸ðÇü¼³°è»ç. the Federal Reserve ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ Áß¾ÓÀºÇà.
indispensable Çʼö ÜôʦÌÀ(ºÒ°¡°á)ÇÑ. wake Áö³ª°£ ÀÚ±¹, ùþîæ(Ç×Àû).
In the wake of ...ÀÇ °á°ú·Î, ...¿¡ µÚÀ̾î. calamity î¬äê(Àç¾Ó).
take a beating ¾ò¾î¸Â´Ù. arrogant °Å¸¸ÇÑ. profession Àü¹®ÀûÀÎ Á÷¾÷, Íëåë(°ø¾ð).
humble ²ª´Ù, °â¼ÕÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Ù. pronouncement Àǰß, Íëͱ(°ø°í).
scepticism ÀǽÉ,üãë÷(ȸÀÇ). rancour ¿øÇÑ, Áõ¿À. lecture °­¿¬, °­ÀÇ.
macroeconomics ËÝãÊÌèð­ùÊ(°Å½Ã°æÁ¦ÇÐ). spectacularly ±²ÀåÇϰÔ, ±ØÀûÀ¸·Î.
at best Àß ÇØ¾ß, ±â²¯Çؾß. positively ¸íÈ®ÇϰÔ. prominent öñêÆ(Ź¿ù)ÇÑ, ÇöÀúÇÑ.
crisis À§±â. cast into doubt ÀǽÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Ù.

B. ±¸¹®
- if he died, the president should . . . a pair of dark glasses on him.󰡓
cf. °¡Á¤¹ý°ú°Å¡æif+S+°ú°Åµ¿»ç..., S+¹ýÁ¶µ¿»ç°ú°Å+V (ÇöÀç»ç½ÇÀÇ ¹Ý´ëÀÇ °æ¿ì¸¦ °¡ Á¤, »ó»ó.)
ex. As he does not work hard, he will not pass the exam.(Á÷¼³¹ý ÇöÀç)
¡æIf he worked hard, he would pass the exam.
[±×°¡ ¸¸¾à Á×´Â´Ù¸é ´ëÅë·ÉÀº ±×¸¦ ¶°¹ÞÃÄ ¾ÉÇô³õ°í °ËÀº ¾È°æÀ» ¾º¿öÁÖ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.(±×°¡ Çϵµ Áß¿äÇÑ Àι°ÀÌ¶ó¼­ ±×°¡ Á׾ Á×Áö ¾ÊÀº °Íó·³ º¸À̵µ·Ï ÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.)]

90-2-424
In its crudest formthe idea that economics as a whole is discreditedthe current backlash has gone far too far. If ignorance allowed investors and politicians to exaggerate the virtues of economics, it now blinds them to its benefits. Economics is less a slavish creed than a prism through which to understand the world. It is a broad canon, stretching from theories to explain how prices are determined to how economies grow. Much of that body of knowledge has no link to the financial crisis and remains as useful as ever.
And if economics as a broad discipline deserves a robust defence, so does the free-market paradigm. Too many people, especially in Europe, equate mistakes made by economists with a failure of economic liberalism. Their logic seems to be that if economists got things wrong, then politicians will do better. That is a falseand dangerousconclusion.

Rational fools
These important caveats, however, should not obscure the fact that two central parts of the disciplinemacroeconomics and financial economicsare now, rightly, being severely re-examined . There are three main critiques: that macro and financial economists helped cause the crisis, that they failed to spot it, and that they have no idea how to fix it.

A. ¾îÈÖ
In its crudest form °¡Àå Åõ¹ÚÇÑ(³ë°ñÀûÀÎ) ÇüÅ·μ­. discredit ½Å¿ëÀ» ¶³¾î¶ß¸®´Ù.
current ÇöÀçÀÇ. backlash ¹Ý¹ß, ¹Ýµ¿. ignorance Ùíò±(¹«Áö). investor ÅõÀÚÀÚ.
exaggerate °úÀåÇÏ´Ù. virtue °¡Ä¡, ÀåÁ¡, ¹Ì´ö. blind ´«¸Ö°Ô ÇÏ´Ù. benefit ÀÌÀÍ.
slavish ¸ð¹æÀûÀÎ, µ¶Ã¢¼ºÀÌ ¾ø´Â, ³ë¿¹ÀÇ, ºñ±¼ÇÑ. creed Îç×â(±³¸®), ãáðÉ(½ÅÁ¶).
canon °èÀ², ¹ýÀü. the financial crisis ±ÝÀ¶À§±â. discipline Çй®ÀÇ ºÐ¾ß.
deserve ...À» ¹ÞÀ» ¸¸ ÇÏ´Ù, ...ÀÇ °¡Ä¡°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. robust ưưÇÑ, °ÇÀåÇÑ.
defence º¯È£, ¿ËÈ£, º¯¸í, ±¹¹æ, ¹æ¾î. equate µ¿ÀϽÃÇÏ´Ù, ÔõãÒûù(µî½ÄÈ­)ÇÏ´Ù.
logic ³í¸®. rational ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ. caveat °æ°í, ÁÖÀÇ. obscure µ¤¾î °¨Ãß´Ù, Èñ¹ÌÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Ù.
macroeconomics ËÝãÊÌèð­ùÊ(°Å½Ã°æÁ¦ÇÐ). rightly ´ç¿¬È÷, ÁøÁ¤À¸·Î.
severely ¾ö°ÝÇϰÔ, ½ÉÇϰÔ. re-examine ÀçÁ¡°ËÇÏ´Ù. critique ºñÆò.
spot ¾Ë¾Æ º¸´Ù, ºÐ°£ÇÏ´Ù. fix ¼ö¸®ÇÏ´Ù.

B. ±¸¹®
- Economics is less a slavish creed . . . to understand the world.
[°æÁ¦ÇÐÀº âÁ¶¼ºÀÌ ¾ø´Â Îç×â(±³¸®)À̱⠺¸´Ù´Â ±×°ÍÀ» ÅëÇØ¼­ ¼¼»óÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÁ¸®Áò °°Àº °ÍÀÌ´Ù.]
  • Æ®À§ÅÍ
  • ÆäÀ̽ººÏ
  • ¡èÀ§·Î
Copyright ¨Ï Á¶°©Á¦´åÄÄ - ¹«´ÜÀüÀç ¹× Àç¹èÆ÷ ±ÝÁö
´ñ±Û´Þ±â ´ñ±Û¾²±â ÁÖÀÇ»çÇ×

´ñ±Û´Þ±â´Â ·Î±×ÀÎÈÄ »ç¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ³»¿ëÀº 100ÀÚ À̳»·Î Àû¾îÁֽʽÿÀ. ±¤°í, ¿å¼³, ºñ¼Ó¾î, ÀνŰø°Ý°ú ÇØ´ç ±Û°ú °ü·Ã ¾ø´Â ±ÛÀº »çÀüÅ뺸¾øÀÌ »èÁ¦µË´Ï´Ù.

¿Ö´õÄ«¸£ÅÚÀ»Àú°ÝÇÑ´Ù
ÀÇ·É ¿ì¹ü°ï ¼ø°æ ÃѱⳭ»ç »ç°Ç
¹Ú½Â¿ëÀÇ FREEDOM ±³¾ç ¿µ¾î
¾ö»óÀÍ º¯È£»çÀÇ ¸ø´ÙÇÑ À̾߱â
UFO¿Í ȯ»ýÀ̾߱â
±è¿µÀÇ åëÖåºñÆÇ
 »ï¼º¹è³Ê

PC ¹öÀü