Big is back ¨ç

Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now they have the advantage again
104. Big is back
Aug 27th 2009 From The Economist print edition

Corporate giants were on the defensive for decades. Now they have the advantage again

104-1-484

IN 1996, in one of his most celebrated phrases, Bill Clinton declared that "the era of big government is over". He might have added that the era of big companies was over, too. The organisation that defined capitalism for much of the 20th century was then in retreat, attacked by corporate raiders, harassed by shareholders and outfoxed by entrepreneurs.
Great names such as Pan Am had disappeared. Others had survived only by dint of huge bloodletting: IBM sacked 122,000 people, a quarter of its workforce, between 1990 and 1995. Everyone agreed that the future lay with entrepreneurial start-ups such as Yahoo!which in late 1998 had the same market capitalisation with 637 employees as Boeing with 230,000. The share of GDP produced by big industrial companies fell by half between 1974 and 1998, from 36% to 17%.
Today the balance of advantage may be shifting again. To a degree, is responsible. It has devastated the venture-capital market, the lifeblood of many young firms. Governments have been rescuing companies they consider too big to fail, such as Citigroup and General Motors. Recession is squeezing out smaller and less well-connected firms. But there are other reasons too, which are giving big companies a self-confidence they have not displayed for decades.

A. ¾îÈÖ
Corporate giants °Å´ëȸ»çµé. defensive ¹æ¾îÀûÀÎ. celebrated Àú¸íÇÑ.
phrase åÞÏ£(¾î±¸). define ïÒëù(Á¤ÀÇ)ÇÏ´Ù. in retreat ÷ÜÊ¿(Åð°¢) Áß¿¡ ÀÖ´Â.
raider ħ·«ÀÚ. harass ±«·ÓÈ÷´Ù, ½Ã´Þ¸®°Ô ÇÏ´Ù. shareholder ñ»ñ«(ÁÖÁÖ).
outfox º¸´Ù ÇÑ ¼ö ´õ ¶ß´Ù, ¼ÓÀÌ´Ù. entrepreneur ãæßæ(½Å»ý) ±â¾÷°¡, ûºÎ¾÷ÀÚ.
by dint of ...¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿©. bloodletting Û¯úì(¹æÇ÷), ÃâÇ÷.
sack ÇØ°íÇÏ´Ù. capitalisation ÁÖ½ÄÀÚº», ÀÚº» úÞʤ(Çö°¡).
share Á¡À¯À². advantage °­Á¡, éÐêÆ(¿ì¿ù). shift À̵¿ÇÏ´Ù.
To a degree ¾î´À Á¤µµ. the financial crisis ±ÝÀ¶À§±â. devastate ȲÆó½ÃŰ´Ù.
venture-capital Åõ±âÀÚº». firm ȸ»ç. rescue ±¸Á¶ÇÏ´Ù. recession °æ±âÈÄÅð.
squeeze out Â¥³»´Ù. self-confidence ÀÚ½Å, ÀڽŰúÀ×. display º¸¿©ÁÖ´Ù, Àü½ÃÇÏ´Ù.

B. ±¸¹®
- He might have added¡æIn fact he did not added.(°¡Á¤¹ý°ú°Å¿Ï·á ±Í°áÀý)

104-2-485
Big can be beautiful¡¦

Of course, big companies never went away. There were still plenty of first-rate ones: Unilever and Toyota continued to innovate through thick and thin. And not all start-ups were models of success: Netscape and Enron promised to revolutionise their industries only to crash and burn. Nevertheless, the balance had shifted in favour of small organisations.
The entrepreneurial boom was supercharged by two developments. Deregulation opened protected markets. Some national champions, such as AT&T, were broken up. Others saw their markets eaten up by swift-footed newcomers. The arrival of the personal computer in the 1970s and the internet in the 1990s created an army of successful start-ups. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak founded Apple Computer in 1976 in the Jobs family's garage. Microsoft and Dell Computer were both founded by teenagers (in 1975 and 1984 respectively). Larry Page and Sergey Brin started Google in Stanford dorm rooms.
But deregulation had already begun to go out of fashion before the financial crisis. The Sarbanes-Oxley act, introduced after Enron collapsed in disgrace, increased the regulatory burden on companies of all sizes, but what could be borne by the big could cripple the small. Many of today's most dynamic industries are much more friendly to big companies than the IT industry. Research in biotechnology is costly and often does not bear fruit for years. Natural-resource companies, whose importance grows as competition for resources intensifies, need to be bighence the mining industry's consolidation.

A. ¾îÈÖ
through thick and thin Ø¿Ññ(¸¸³­)À» ¹«¸¨¾²°í, ã·ðûìéλ(½ÃÁ¾Àϰü)ÇÏ¿©.
start-up µµÀüÀûÀÎ ±â¾÷. balance ±ÕÇü, Àú¿ï. entrepreneurial ±â¾÷ÀÇ.
supercharge ΦÐå(°ú±Þ)ÇÏ´Ù, ÈûÀ» Áö³ªÄ¡°Ô ½ñ´Ù. deregulation Юð¤(±ÔÁ¦)öÆó.
break up ÇØÃ¼ÇÏ´Ù. swift-footed ¹ßÀÌ ºü¸¥. army ¹«¸®, ¶¼.
start-up »õ·Î »ý±ä ±â¾÷. garage ó³Í·(Â÷°í). respectively °¢°¢.
Stanford dorm ½ºÅÄÆ÷µå ´ëÇб³ ±â¼÷»ç. financial crisis ±ÝÀ¶À§±â.
act ¹ý·É. collapse ºØ±«ÇÏ´Ù. disgrace ºÒ¸í¿¹. regulatory burden ±ÔÁ¦ÀÇ ºÎ´ã.
bear-bore-borne °ßµð´Ù. cripple ¹«·ÂÇÏ°Ô ¸¸µé´Ù, ÇØÄ¡´Ù.
natural-resource õ¿¬ÀÚ¿ø. competition °æÀï. intensify °­È­µÇ´Ù.
mining industry ±¤¹°»ê¾÷. consolidation ÅëÇÕ, ÇÕº´, °­È­.

B. ±¸¹®
- only to crash and burn.=but they crashed and burned.
  • Æ®À§ÅÍ
  • ÆäÀ̽ººÏ
  • ¡èÀ§·Î
Copyright ¨Ï Á¶°©Á¦´åÄÄ - ¹«´ÜÀüÀç ¹× Àç¹èÆ÷ ±ÝÁö
´ñ±Û´Þ±â ´ñ±Û¾²±â ÁÖÀÇ»çÇ×

´ñ±Û´Þ±â´Â ·Î±×ÀÎÈÄ »ç¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ³»¿ëÀº 100ÀÚ À̳»·Î Àû¾îÁֽʽÿÀ. ±¤°í, ¿å¼³, ºñ¼Ó¾î, ÀνŰø°Ý°ú ÇØ´ç ±Û°ú °ü·Ã ¾ø´Â ±ÛÀº »çÀüÅ뺸¾øÀÌ »èÁ¦µË´Ï´Ù.

¿Ö´õÄ«¸£ÅÚÀ»Àú°ÝÇÑ´Ù
ÀÇ·É ¿ì¹ü°ï ¼ø°æ ÃѱⳭ»ç »ç°Ç
¹Ú½Â¿ëÀÇ FREEDOM ±³¾ç ¿µ¾î
¾ö»óÀÍ º¯È£»çÀÇ ¸ø´ÙÇÑ À̾߱â
UFO¿Í ȯ»ýÀ̾߱â
±è¿µÀÇ åëÖåºñÆÇ
 »ï¼º¹è³Ê

PC ¹öÀü